Please note: At your instructor's discretion,
there may be minor alterations to the reading
assignments listed below. One of the major advantages to
providing you with an on-line readings archive is that
timely articles can be added or substituted when
appropriate. Opening documents downloaded from this
website will require that your computer have
Acrobat Reader . You will also need the
class-specific password to open individual files.
Unit 2
Some resources for the rest of the
term:
-
Citation instructions for papers
in Setzler courses (on-line handout).
Just familiarize yourself with this so that you are
aware of what will be expected of you in papers. For
example, as you are taking notes on reading or
summarizing readings for future use in papers, you
should note page numbers for ideas since you will be
asked to include page-specific citations in papers
(but not on tests, of course).
Topic 6 -What does
globalization mean for us? Should we embrace or fear
it?
February 14, 17
(F, M) - How did power come to be organized around
states, and what will globalization mean for that
structure?
Reading for Friday:
February 19
(W) - What does
globalization mean for the future look of the
international political system and America's central
role in it? Are we going to walk away from the
international institutions, norms, and alliances we
built even if it makes us relatively less powerful
and the world more dangerous?
February 21 (F)- Discussion
seminar 4: Are America's best days behind
her?
Maybe this time is different?:
Topic 7 -To what
extent do non-democracies pose a threat to our way of
life?
March 3 (M)-Why
are most people willing to put up with non-democratic
governments in some instances?
March 5 (W)-What
is daily life like in a non-democracy? How does the
government maintain control without using much force?
Start working on your self-assessment essay. It will
be do this coming Wednesday.
-
For homework, watch the first 84 minutes (i.e., up to
"Rules of the Game) of this two-hour documentary on
life in contemporary Iran: https://www.pbs.org/video/our-man-in-tehran-part-one-p9eu3w/.
Please watch the remainder (of the 84 clip) that we
don't finish in class later in the day.
Pro tip: You can save yourself 40 min. if watch at
1.5x speed, which won't speed things up so much that
it's not easy to follow. The main thing you should try
to understand is how Iran's authoritarian (sometimes
incorrectly labeled as totalitarian) regime acts in
practice and how everyday people respond to this. What
does it mean, as the film's intro puts it: "Everything
is forbidden, but everything is possible"? How do
undemocratic regimes exercise control over their
people? When and how does the Iranian government use
force, who uses it, and what are the alternatives the
Iranian state uses to resist change? In what ways are
the Iranian people relatively free, and where is state
repression extreme? How is life different and in many
ways the same in a non-democratic regime? Is there any
evidence that change will come to Iran? Why do the
regime’s supporters resist this change?
March 7
(F) How undemocratic is today's Iran?
March 10 (M)-
Discussion seminar 4: What is
the problem with undemocratic countries like Iran having
weapons of mass destruction when several of the leading
democracies do, too?
- Note, you need to write three papers this term. You
already have written one discussion topic paper. This
week, you will be writing a self-assessment paper. Your
last paper will be another discussion topic essay. The
self-assessment essay is due electronically
and in hard paper copy at the start of the
Wednesday's class (March 12).
The paper topic and instruction's for this
discussion topic are linked: here. If you
choose to write on this topic, your paper will be due
on Wednesday, March 26.
The reason why the due date is later than usual is so
that you can write your paper after you have finished
your self-assessment essay and the Unit 2 test.
There are a lot of readings listed below, but
notice they add up to only about a single textbook
chapter's length in total. I've selected these
particular article because they are short, while still
providing a range of perspectives:
-
The Economist, "The Long, Long Half
Life" (6 pp). It looks like there is a lot of
reading for this day, but notice that these are all
pretty shorty. In each case, use the focus questions
to guide your reading. Each selection is assigned to
give you background on a specific piece of the puzzle
for why countries are being treated so differently
under international law if they pursue nuclear
weapons. In this first assignment, focus on the key
elements of the Non-Proliferation Treaty and the
different obligations they put on the US and Iran.
Topic 8: Why do some leaders succeed while others fail
in the US and elsewhere?
March 12 (W)-
Making sense of the idiosyncratic attributes
leaders (Can we generalize about leadership qualities or
all leaders unique to their place and time?)
-
Your
self-assessment essay is due electronically
and in hard paper copy at the start of class
on Wednesday, March 12.
Follow the directions very closely. The assignment
sheet is in the PPTs/Assignments folder on the course
homepage.
-
Joseph
Nye, "When Do President's Steer Foreign Policy?"
(Atlantic Monthly, 3pp)
-
Gautam Mukunda, A brief selection
from Indispensable: When Leaders Really Matter.
Read this quickly, focusing on the main points.
-
Kurt
Weyland, "Why Latin America Is Becoming Less
Democratic" (Atlantic 2013,
13pp). As you read this article, pay close attention
to what populism is, what it looks like in practice,
and why it is a real threat to democracy once deeply
entrenched by either populist leaders or a party they
have captured. Why does Weyland see leftist populists
as ultimately more of a problem than right-wing
populists (i.e., how/why do the former typically come
to power, who is their base, and what economic
policies do they pursue that strengthen/undermine
their hold on society over time).
March 14, 17 (F, M)-
Why do American Presidents do what they, do and how much
control do they actually have in shaping the way the
country heads?
-
Who are the great, average, and lousy presidents, and
how can we measure this?: Nate
Silver, "Contemplating Obama's Place in History,
Statistically" (FiveThirtyEight, 2013, 7pp).
The most commonly cited ranking--C-Span's survey of presidential
historians--placed President Obama at #12 in
2017; his lowest performance areas were "Relations
with Congress" (#39 out of 44) and "International
Relations" (#24/44).
How did President Trump rate in different areas? How
do you think Biden will rank? Again, try putting away
your partisan hat and think about what makes some
presidents more effective than others along with the
determinants that presidents can and can’t control by
themselves.
-
What relationship is there between
popularity and presidential greatness? Hint: Very
little. Look at the average popularity ratings (both
approval and disapproval rates) and patterns of
popular support over time for Biden so far: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/biden-approval-rating/
(Compare them to other presidents look at the bottom
and use the 8-year settings).
Notice how the ratings for Trump and Biden differ from
what is typical (the normal pattern is very popular
-> serious bumps -> and then quite popular at
the very end. Compare Biden to: Obama (top quartile),
Reagan (a top-ten president), B. Clinton (an average
president), Truman (top-ten), and Trump (who
historians rank in the bottom 5). Why is the
popularity of recent presidents lower but more stable
than what was the case for the previous several
decades?
-
Julia Azeri, "Why Republicans Can't
Govern" (FiveThirtyEight 2017, 3pp). This
article was written when Republicans nominally
controlled all branches of government. The reasons for
President Trump's difficulties after the 2018 election
are different. This article offers good insights into
why President Biden also has serious problems
fulfilling most of the big policy promises he made as
a candidate.
March 19 (W)- Discussion
seminar: What Makes Some Presidents More Successful than
Others? To What Extent Does Presidential Performance
Reflect the Personal Qualities of a Particular
President?
-
Recall that your last paper for the term will be
another discussion topic essay. You will have several
topic choices. If you want to write on presidential
leadership, the paper topic and instruction's for
this topic are linked: here. If you
choose to write on this topic, your paper will be
due on Wednesday,
March 26.
-
Watch PBS's The Choice: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/the-choice-2024-harris-vs-trump/
The Choice series has been running since the 2000
elections and is meant to provide viewers with a
biographical background of the two major-party
nominees, focusing on the primary life events that
have shaped how the ethics, decision-making style,
life-outlook, and motivations of each candidate. Note
that you may want to consider changing the playback
speed so that you can take this material in more
quickly.
Discussion questions for you to take notes on as you
watch the video:
-
What were the primary motivations
for each man in choosing a political career and to
run for the presidency?
-
What are distinctive character and
ethical qualities of each man? Where did they come
from?
-
What evidence is provided and is
the documentary biased in how it presents the
candidate's motivations? Sometimes the same
candidate is called "focused and internally
driven" by one person, but "ruthless, and nakedly
ambitious" by another? Do both of these
descriptions apply to both candidates, neither, or
one better than the other?
-
Based on what you saw, describe
each man's decision-making style, what they spend
that their day doing and why, and how they
motivate those around them (their staff, other
politicians whose support they need, and the
public) to enact their agenda.
-
What are the central policy
priorities of each man that might cause someone to
want to be president? What policy would they most
like to achieve as their legacy? Does either seem
to have one of those?
-
Did you see any traits in either
candidate that make you wonder how this person
became a major party nominee? Do either of them
have specific character flaws that in your view
should be disqualifying? Is there any way to think
about those flaws in a different way that might
change your mind?
-
Thinking about the nominee who you
least prefer, try to articulate what it is
that more than a 100 million of your fellow
Americans see in that person that you don't. In
trying to walk a a day in a neighbor's shoes, so
to speak, focus your argument on who that
candidate is as a person and what they have
accomplished in their life rather than focusing on
specific policy wins, their relationship with
other politicians who you support, or something
like Supreme Court appointments.
-
Aubrey Immelman, "The Leadership
Style of U.S. President Donald J. Trump" (January
2017, 17pp). This report is very typical of a
political psychological approach to understanding and
predicting presidential behavior. Pay attention
to the methodology: What kind of evidence did she use?
What was the process of characterizing the president?
How correctly did she anticipate his behavior?
Your Unit 2 test will be Friday, March 21. If
you have OARS accomoations that involve extended testing
time or a quiet environment, make arrangements to use
the testing facility well in advance of the exam.
Remember that you need to write one (just
one) more a discussion-topic essay this semester. Just
like the first essay, you will choose the topic you want
to write on for the last paper. The writing topics and
essay instructions for each option are linked in the
materials assigned for the discussion day. Typically, the
due date for a given topic is a week or so after we have
had the discussion class. For the two most recent topics
(weapons of mass destruction in the hands of
non-democracies and presidential leadership), I have
delayed these papers' due date until Wednesday March 26,
so that you have the option of writing on one of these
topics after the test if you would like.
|